← Back to blog

Artificial intelligence

AI in music: applications, limitations, and artist decisions.

6 min read

Understand how AI participates in the composition, production, recommendation, and creation of audiovisual content, with criteria for evaluating results and preserving artistic direction.

artificial intelligence in music, ia in music
In this article

AI in music can generate sound material, support production tasks, and participate in systems that recommend tracks to listeners. Each application requires a different assessment. Creating a draft, processing a mix, and organizing a playlist are distinct problems, even when they appear under the same artificial intelligence label.

For an artist, the useful question begins with the work they need to do: developing an idea, solving an audible problem, exploring a visual direction, or understanding how their music reaches the audience. The tool comes later, accompanied by selection criteria and a listening process that decides what deserves to remain.

composing music with ia

Musical composition: generating material and creating a work.

Generative systems can produce material from instructions and other resources provided by the platform. The result can serve as a study, draft, or element of a larger process. This does not mean that any output corresponds to the artist's intention or is ready for release.

Separate the generation from the compositional decisions. What motif should return? Where does the lyric need to breathe? Does the harmonic shift prepare the next section? A compelling opening in the first few seconds can lose direction later. Revising form, continuity, and articulation remains part of the work.

If you already compose on an instrument, you can compare a played idea with a generated draft and note what you really want to develop. If you start with text, describe musical elements and the piece's trajectory, instead of relying solely on adjectives. In both cases, record your choices and keep the versions that support the process.

The map distinguishes four AI applications in music: generating material, processing audio, analyzing recordings, and recommending music. Each requires an evaluation question; human direction defines criteria, listens, selects, and reviews.
Overview of possible tasks. Generating, processing, analyzing, and recommending answer different questions and do not form a mandatory sequence.

Production and mastering: evaluating what changes in the sound.

Assistive tools can analyze audio and suggest processing. LANDR presents its automated mastering service. as an application of AI at this stage. The fact that a process is automated does not demonstrate that it improves any recording or replaces all engineering decisions.

Compare the audio at similar volumes. Observe the clarity of the voice, the control of the bass, the transients, and the continuity between parts. A louder version may seem more impactful on first listen without resolving the problem that prompted the processing.

If the mix has one instrument masking another, processing the stereo file might not offer the same control as reviewing the source tracks. Go back to the arrangement and mix when necessary. The question should be "what does the music need?", accompanied by specific listening.

automatic music mastering

Audio separation and analysis: results need context.

Separating vocals and accompaniment can help when studying a passage or preparing authorized material for editing. The resulting file may contain residue, leakage, and timbre changes. Confirm its usefulness in the entire passage, especially regarding consonants, reverberations, and instruments that share the same register.

Similarly, estimates of BPM, pitch, and structure should be checked against the recording. An automatic reading can offer a starting point; it does not eliminate ambiguities in pulse, key changes, or analysis choices.

Before submitting a file to a service, check usage authorizations, submission conditions, and deletion options. Do not treat a detection tool as sole proof of a song's origin. Documentation of the process and the provenance of the files must accompany any investigation.

Recommendation is different from distribution.

Distributing a track involves delivering it to platforms via an appropriate workflow, along with the required files and metadata. Recommending is deciding what content to present to a particular listener within a given experience. These processes are related, but they are not the same operation.

THE Spotify describes discovery and personalization features. which help listeners find music. This does not allow one to predict that a specific track will be recommended, nor does it transform a musical characteristic into a guarantee of reach.

A song like Love in Disguise, presented here through its creation process., It can be found through different paths. What is up to the artist is to prepare a coherent presentation, correct metadata, and real listening opportunities, without promising results from a system they don't control.

Personalized experiences and musical discovery

A recommendation can bring the listener closer to something they recognize or present an unexpected direction. For the listener, it's worthwhile to alternate automatic suggestions with complete albums, human curation, presentations, and deliberate research. This way, discovery isn't limited to a single path.

For the artist, observe which works and contexts spark interest using only available and authorized data. Playlist numbers, browsing behavior, and bookings answer different questions. Avoid interpreting isolated growth as proof that a tool or strategy caused the result.

Music videos and audiovisual direction

Generating images or video clips can be part of visual research and plan development. A music video, however, also depends on direction: its relationship with the music, shot selection, continuity, editing, color, and finalization.

Start with a short excerpt and a clear intention. Define what should remain constant between shots and what needs to change. Test the sequence in real time before expanding the production. A beautiful shot in isolation may not fulfill the necessary narrative function.

Do not present a generated image as a record of a real event. Identifying it as a conceptual illustration, when appropriate, helps the audience understand the nature of the material and preserves editorial clarity.

personalized experiences

A roadmap for deciding when to use AI.

QuestionPractical decision
What task needs to be solved?Define an observable outcome before choosing the tool.
How will I evaluate the exit?Choose a passage, a reference, and criteria for listening or an image.
Can I send and use the material?Check the authorizations, current terms, and purpose of the project.
What needs intervention?Make a note of any pending cuts, re-recordings, edits, and checks.
Does the result meet the intention?Compare with the alternative and keep only what is useful for the project.
A small, verifiable process helps avoid choices based solely on the novelty of the tool.

You don't need to incorporate AI at every stage. You can use it in a study and dispense with it in the final recording, or choose an acoustic flow from beginning to end. Consistency arises from artistic decisions and the polished finish that the work demands.

To develop harmony, form, and organization of ideas, read the musical composition guide. It delves into the process of transforming materials into a finished piece, with or without automated assistance.

[email protected]